Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    SOCCERTIMEZ
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Home
    • News
    • NBA
    • WNBA
    • MLB
    • Soccer
    • Sports
    SOCCERTIMEZ
    You are at:Home » Bombshell Analysis:David Sullivan West Ham co-owner ‘used club to pay £700,000 tax’ after tribunal court ruled out the controversial issues
    News

    Bombshell Analysis:David Sullivan West Ham co-owner ‘used club to pay £700,000 tax’ after tribunal court ruled out the controversial issues

    adminBy adminNovember 9, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    David Sullivan: West Ham co-owner ‘used club to avoid paying £700,000 tax’

    David Sullivan and David Gold
    Image caption, David Sullivan and David Gold took over West Ham in January 2010

    West Ham co-owner David Sullivan used the club to avoid paying £700,000 in tax, a tribunal has ruled.

    He has been told to pay back the money after it was found he deliberately tried to benefit from the transfer of £2m from his family business in 2010.

    West Ham and Sullivan declined to comment although it is understood he intends to appeal against the decision.

    The news emerged at a time when West Ham’s board have faced protests from fans unhappy at how the club is run.

    Sullivan, 68, was forced to leave the directors’ box after being hit by a coin at the club’s last home game, against Burnley at London Stadium.

    The first-tier tax tribunal heard that Sullivan used his family business, Conegate Ltd, to buy £2m of shares in the holding company that owns West Ham.

    On the same day the shares were converted to “deferred shares”, which were deemed practically worthless and sold back to the holding company for £1. Conegate then used the £2m loss to reduce its tax bill by £700,000, as first reported by The Times.

    Tribunal judge Jane Bailey acknowledged the “overarching” reason for the transactions was to provide funds for the club.

    But she added: “It is clear from our findings of fact that there was more than one way to provide funding to the football club and that one of the reasons that Mr Sullivan chose to provide funds to the football club in the specific way that transpired was so that the appellant (Sullivan) could claim a capital loss.

    “Therefore we consider securing a tax advantage to have been ‘one of the main purposes’ of the arrangements.”

    Penny Ciniewicz, HM Revenue and Customs director general for customer compliance, said: “Conegate built tax structures to avoid paying the tax that was rightfully due.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleJust Now:Freddie Potts Dominates Midfield Metrics but Pundits Hand Man of the Match to Mateus Fernandes
    Next Article Breaking News:Nuno Espirito Santo sends Starks warning message to David Sullivan with bold decision made at West Ham
    admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    According to pundits: Axel Disasi’s Whereabouts Revealed as West Ham Await Last-Ditch Deadline Day Signing

    February 2, 2026

    Tottenham make deadline day exit call as West Ham want Antonin Kinsky swoop

    February 2, 2026

    Instant karma for Lucas Paqueta as he issues grovelling apology after abandoning West Ham

    February 2, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Trending Now
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    © 2026 Soccertimez. Managed by Admin.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.